(8+16)
AO1 Bitter Taste
An example of an evolved food preference is
that the experience of bitter taste has evolved to detect potentially harmful
toxins in plants. Sandell and Breslin (2006) screened 35 adults for the bitter
taste receptor gene. Those with the sensitive form of this gene were more
likely to experience toxic glucoseinolates as bitter, which would explain why
such genes are widespread In modern times.
Preference for fatty foods was so adaptive
because the harsh conditions faced by early humans in the EEA meant that foods
that provided energy resources were vital to survive. Early humans would
therefore have evolved a preference for calorific rich foods, such as meat. A
meat diet was full of nutrients, and became the catalyst for rapid brain
growth.
There is research support for the evolved
preference for high calorie foods. For example, Gibson and Wardle et al tested
the preferences for specific fruits and vegetables among 4-5yearolds. They
predicted that children would prefer foods that were rich in calories (such as
bananas and potatoes) over other foods, which is what they found.
Evidence from comparative studies of closely related non-human species
has supported the importance of saturated fats in the diets of early humans.
Stanford studied chimpanzees in Gombe National park. When these animals were
close to starvation and managed to kill a monkey to eat, they went straight to
the fattiest parts (e.g. brain) rather than the more nutritious flesh.
AO2
The Importance of calories in early humans’ diets is challenged by
Cordain et al. (2006) who claimed that early humans obtained calories from
sources other than animal fats, and may even have been vegetarian. However,
this in turn has been challenged by anthropological evidence, which has shown
that all societies show a preference for animal fats suggesting that this is a
universal evolved preference.
AO1 Taste Aversion
Taste aversion is an evolved defensive mechanism that enables predators to survive encounters with prey with
toxic defences. When early humans experienced nausea after consuming toxic prey
they formed a long- lasting aversion to the taste and scent of this type of
food. The medicine effect is a tendency for Individuals to develop a reference for any food
eaten prior to recovery from an illness.
AO2
Garcia et al provides research to support taste aversion. He found that
rats who had been made ill through radiation shortly after eating saccharin,
developed an aversion to it and very quickly associated their illness with the
saccharin.
AO2
A real-world application of taste aversion is to understand the food
avoidance that is often found in children being treated for cancer. Some cancer
treatments, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy have the side effect of
causing gastrointestinal illness. When this illness is paired with eating a
particular food such as ice cream, a taste aversion to that food can result.
Therefore this has resulted in the development of giving patients a novel food
along with some familiar food prior to the chemotherapy in which the patient
creates an aversion to the novel food.
AO2/IDA
The view that all food preferences are due to evolutionary factors is
challenged by the fact that there are cultural differences in food likes and
dislikes. Although there are some universal preferences, e.g. for sweet
foods, these innate responses do not account for the broad range of food
preferences found in different cultures. It is likely that these preferences (e.g.
for spicy foods) developed because of cultural tastes and preferences.
IDA
The evolutionary perspective is both reductionist and determinist. The
explanation is an oversimplification by suggesting that adaptiveness is the
single, guiding principle. Such explanations are also determinist, as they
propose that eating behaviour is determined by past environments, thereby
overlooking the notion of free will and the fact that human behaviour is
affected by many other factors such as thought, emotions and social factors.
No comments:
Post a Comment